top of page
Short Track Skaters.webp

Accessibility Audit

Utah Olympic Oval: Making Olympic Excellence Accessible to All

1  |  The Strategic Opportunity

The Utah Olympic Oval (the "Fastest Ice on Earth") set 10 Olympic records during the 2002 Winter Games. With the 2034 Olympics approaching, this world-class venue needed to ensure its digital presence matched its physical excellence. But there was a problem: the website was excluding millions of users with disabilities from accessing information about programs, purchasing tickets, or fully experiencing the Olympic legacy.

​

I found the disconnect between the organization's values (as part of the international Olympic/Paralympic movement and the global call for inclusivity) and the site's digital accessibility compelling. And I saw an opportunity to demonstrate value through a comprehensive accessibility audit, a freelance project that would reveal hidden barriers and (hopefully) influence an entire website rebuild.


My Role: Accessibility Specialist & UX Researcher (Freelance)
Methods: WCAG 2.1 compliance audit, automated testing (WAVE, Axe DevTools), manual evaluation
Duration: 2 weeks
Stakeholders: Utah Olympic Legacy Foundation COO and Marketing Director
Impact: Audit became foundational for the decision to do a complete website rebuild

2  |  The Story Behind the Audit

The Catalyst

I was familiar with the UOO site through work in another capacity with the Utah Olympic Legacy Foundation and had heard rumblings about the need for a website rebuild. Since I'd had extensive training in accessibility and inclusive design through my MS in UX program at Arizona State University, I thought they needed to understand the current state of the site's accessibility before investing significant resources into any such rebuild. I proposed a comprehensive audit to establish a baseline and provide actionable recommendations — turning compliance requirements into a strategic roadmap.


The Human Cost of Inaccessibility
Consider these scenarios:

  • A Paralympic athlete trying to find training schedules but unable to navigate with their keyboard

  • A veteran with low vision unable to read white text on orange backgrounds (1.97:1 contrast ratio)

  • A parent using a screen reader to register their child for skating lessons, encountering images without descriptions

  • An elderly resident wanting to attend public skating but confused by color-only link indicators

 

These weren't edge cases; they represented thousands of potential visitors being excluded from Olympic legacy programs.​

3  |  The Systematic Discovery Process

Methodology: Beyond Automated Testing​

I evaluated three representative pages over two weeks:​

  • Home Page: First impressions and primary navigation

  • Public Skating Page: Program information and schedules

  • Memberships/Annual Passes Page: Purchase flows

 

Using WAVE and Axe DevTools, I identified violations across

the four POUR principles:

  • Perceivable: Can users perceive the content?
    Operable: Can users operate the interface?
    Understandable: Can users understand the information?
    Robust: Does it work with assistive technologies?​

 

The Audit Framework

Each violation was assessed for:

  • WCAG Criterion: Specific standard violated

  • Severity Level: Critical or Moderate impact

  • User Impact: Who's affected and how

  • Legal Risk: ADA Title III and CVAA compliance

  • Remediation Path: Specific fix required

​

​Wireframes

Using Figma, I created wireframes of the 3 key pages and annotated

these wireframes indicating numbered accessibility issues per the

POUR principles and modified WCAG criteria.

​

Annotations 1.png

4  |  Key Findings: 14 Violations

The Numbers Tell a Story: 14 Total Violations

  • 9 Critical Issues: Blocking essential functionality​

  • 5 Moderate Issues: Degrading the user experience

 

But numbers alone don't capture the full impact, so let me detail what some of these barriers actually looked like.

 

Critical Finding 1: Invisible to Screen Readers

​

The Problem: Multiple images throughout the site lacked alt text, rendering them completely invisible to screen reader users.


​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​


The Human Impact:

  • Screen reader users hear "image" with no context

  • Key information in infographics completely lost

  • Promotional content meaningless without descriptions

​

The Solution: Alternative text must be incorporated into the site code for all non-text content to help people who have difficulty perceiving visual content.

​

Critical Finding 2: Unreadable Color Constrast

​

The Problem: The signature orange (#FFA433) used throughout the site created a 1.97:1 contrast ratio with white text—far below the required 4.5:1 minimum. Other areas of the site used color contrast ratios such that it made important information unreadable, even users facing temporary environmental disabilities (e.g. in sunlight).

​

​

​

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

The Human Impact:

  • Users with low vision unable to read CTAs

  • Outdoor mobile viewing nearly impossible

  • Aging population excluded from key actions

 

The Solution: A sufficient contrast ratio of at least

4.5:1 must be provided between text and background.

​

Critical Finding 3: Keyboard Navigation Broken

​​

The Problem:  Essential functionality was mouse-only. Keyboard users couldn't reach submenus, focus indicators were missing, and navigation loops trapped users.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The Human Impact:

  • Users with motor disabilities unable to navigate

  • Power users preferring keyboard shortcuts frustrated

  • Assistive technology users blocked from content

​

The Solution: Ensure that any pointer actions have an equivalent for keyboard only so that everything can be done with a keyboard.

​​

Critical Finding 4: Color-Only State Changes

​​

The Problem:  Links relied solely on color change (orange)

to indicate hover/focus states, providing no other visual cue.


The Human Impact:

  • Colorblind users (e.g., 8% of males) unable to distinguish
    changes in states

  • Users with cognitive disabilities may miss important
    interaction cues

  • Monochrome/high contrast mode users lose functionality

​

The Solution: Links that merely change color upon hover

must have another visual cue added, such as underlines,

bold or italics.

​

Critical Finding 5: Video Without Audio Description

​​

The Problem:  The Olympic Legacy Foundation promotional

video lacked audio description for visual content.


The Human Impact:

  • Blind users missing crucial visual information

  • Context and meaning lost without scene descriptions

  • Inspirational Olympic moments inaccessible

​

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Solution: Links that merely change color upon hover

must have another visual cue added, such as underlines,

bold or italics.

​

Critical Finding 6: Mystery Links and Buttons

​​

The Problem:  Social media icons, videos, and generic "EXPLORE" links lacked descriptive link text or context.

​

​

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

The Human Impact:

  • Screen reader users hearing "link" with no destination

  • Cognitive disabilities users confused by vague labels

  • All users unsure where links lead

​​

The Solution: Descriptive names or context for all links must be provided so users with disabilities and using assistive technology can understand what each link will do.

​

Moderate but Important Issues​​

Beyond critical violations, I identified other issues that, while moderate, impact the user experience:

  • No "Skip to Content" Link: Forcing keyboard users through entire navigation repeatedly

  • Auto-rotating Carousel: No pause control for users with cognitive disabilities

  • No Search Function: No alternative way to find content

  • Pop-up Confusion: Context changes without warning

  • Missing Site Map: No overview for users who need structure

5  |  Strategic Recommendations

Immediate Fixes (Legal Risk Mitigation)

  • Alt Text Implementation: Systematic addition across all images

  • Contrast Ratio Fixes: New color palette meeting WCAG standards

  • Keyboard Navigation: Complete keyboard operability

  • Focus Indicators: Visible focus states throughout

​

Quick Wins (High Impact, Low Effort)

  • Skip Links: Simple addition improving navigation efficiency

  • Link Text Enhancement: Descriptive labels for all links

  • ARIA Labels: Screen reader compatibility for UI components

 

Strategic Improvements (Enhanced Experience)

  • Search Functionality: Alternative navigation method

  • Carousel Controls: User control over motion

  • Site Map: Comprehensive content overview

  • Consistent Navigation: Predictable interaction patterns

​

Immediate Fixes (Legal Risk Mitigation)

  • Alt Text Implementation: Systematic addition across all images

  • Contrast Ratio Fixes: New color palette meeting WCAG standards

  • Keyboard Navigation: Complete keyboard operability

  • Focus Indicators: Visible focus states throughout

6  |  The Business Case: Beyond Compliance

Risk Mitigation

  • Legal Compliance: ADA Title III and CVAA requirements

  • Lawsuit Prevention: Avoiding costly litigation

  • Reputation Protection: Demonstrating inclusive values

 

Market Expansion

  • 26% of Adults have some form of disability

  • $490 Billion in disposable income (US disability market)

  • Aging Population: Growing demographic needing accessibility

 

Operational Benefits

  • Reduced Support Calls: Clearer, more navigable site

  • Improved SEO: Accessibility features boost search rankings

  • Mobile Performance: Accessibility improvements tend to benefit all mobile users​

7  |  Reflection: Accessibility as Opportunity

Key Learnings

  1. Proactive Beats Reactive: Initiating this audit as a freelance project and sharing with stakeholders demonstrated thought leadership and created opportunity

  2. Visualization Drives Understanding: Annotated wireframes made abstract violations tangible for stakeholders

  3. Stories Trump Statistics: Connecting violations to real user (human) impacts resonated more than compliance percentages

  4. Accessibility Benefits Everyone: Many fixes (better contrast, clear labels, keyboard navigation) improve usability for all users (i.e., the "curb-cut effect")

  5. Documentation Enables Action: Systematic, thorough documentation can become the foundation for organizational change


Tools and Methods
Testing Tools:

  • WAVE (WebAIM's Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool)

  • Axe DevTools (Deque's accessibility testing toolkit)

  • Manual keyboard navigation testing

  • Color contrast analyzers

 

Standards & Guidelines:

  • WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliance

  • ADA Title III requirements

  • CVAA video accessibility standards

  • Section 508 guidelines

​

8 |  Had enough or are you thirsty for more?

Like what you see?

Let's chat.

© 2025 by Sean Hayden Anthony. Created with Wix.com

bottom of page