top of page

Case Study

Utah Olympic Oval: From Olympic
Legacy to Community Confusion

1  |  The Challenge

The Utah Olympic Oval — home to 10 Olympic records during the 2002 Winter Games — had transformed over time from an elite sports venue into a thriving community hub. But its website hadn't kept pace. Built when the Oval offered limited programs, the site had grown in a "cobbled together" fashion as new activities were added over the years. With the 2034 Olympics approaching, the venue needed a digital experience that could serve both Olympic athletes and local patrons of all ages and abilities seeking access to activities and programs.​

​

​​​​​​​​​​​​My Role: UX Researcher

Methods: Heuristic evaluation, user survey, moderated usability testing, persona development

Duration: 4 weeks

Context: Solo research project for the MS in UX program at Arizona State University

2  |  The Story Behind the Research

Setting the Scene

Picture this: You're a parent in Salt Lake City. Your daughter wants to learn synchronized skating at the same venue where Olympic champions trained. You visit the Utah Olympic Oval website to find class information. Instead, you encounter:
 

  • Two competing navigation menus that prioritize the parent organization (Utah Olympic Legacy Foundation) over the venue itself

  • No search function to help you find what you need

  • A logo that takes you to the wrong homepage when clicked

  • Contact/support information that is either not where it should logically be or, when found, leads to the wrong support team

 

This was the reality uncovered through comprehensive usability research.

​

Research Process
1. Multi-Method Approach

I designed a three-phase research strategy to triangulate findings:

  • Heuristic Evaluation: Systematic and comprehensive review using Nielsen's 10 Usability Heuristics

  • User Survey: 15 respondents from the Oval's mailing list

  • Usability Testing: 3 participants completing real-world tasks

 

2. Understanding the Users

From survey data, I developed three personas representing core user segments:

 

  • Emily, The Family Planner (35-44)
    My family is my #1 priority and I'm a fan of anything that makes my life easier when it comes to planning things for them."
     

  • Alex, The Competitor (25-34)
    "For a serious athlete, there is nothing worse than showing up for a planned workout and finding that you can't train."
     

  • Grace, The Health-Conscious Retiree (65+)
    "The world's just gotten so complicated and sometimes I need the reassurance that things for my health journey can be simple."​

​

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Recruiting the Right Participants

To ensure testing reflected actual user experiences, I recruited participants who were already familiar with the Utah Olympic Oval as a venue. This was crucial—I needed users who had real stakes in finding information and completing tasks, not just evaluating an unfamiliar website.
 

Recruitment Strategy: I leveraged my network in the Salt Lake City area to identify friends and family who had previously:
 

  • Attended events at the Oval

  • Used the facility for training or recreation

  • Explored programs for themselves or family members

 

Final Participant Profile:
 

  • 3 participants from the greater Salt Lake City area

  • Age range: Represented different life stages and tech comfort levels

  • Oval familiarity: All had prior experience with the venue (attending events, considering programs, or using facilities)

  • Tech savviness: Mix of comfort levels with digital tools (self-rated 3-5 on a 5-point scale)

 

Why This Mattered: Unlike generic usability testing, these participants brought authentic mental models of what they expected from an Olympic venue website. They knew the Oval offered various programs, understood its Olympic significance, and had genuine scenarios where they might need to find information or make purchases. This familiarity made their struggles with navigation and task completion even more significant—if people who knew the venue couldn't navigate the site effectively, newcomers would face even greater challenges.
 

This recruitment approach aligned with the venue's actual user base: local residents who view the Oval as both an Olympic landmark and a community recreation facility.
 

4. Task-Based Testing Approach

I created scenarios that reflected actual user goals,

grounded in both heuristic findings and survey insights:

 

  • Task 1: Family Activity Planning
    Find and register for synchronized skating lessons

  • Task 2: Athletic Training Access
    Purchase track passes for winter training

  • Task 3: Community Discovery
    Learn about the Oval's Olympic history and

  • current offerings

​

The Research in Action

I conducted face-to-face sessions at the Utah Olympic Oval, observing participants navigate real tasks while thinking aloud. The venue setting added authenticity—participants could envision themselves as actual users trying to plan their next visit.

Tasks Sheets_edited_edited.jpg

3  |  Key Findings: Olympic Excellence Meets Digital Frustration

Finding 1: Competing Menus Created Navigation Chaos

​

The Evidence:​

  • 100% of participants expressed confusion about
    dual menu systems (one for the Foundation and one
    for the Oval – but unclear distinction)

  • Users uniformly didn't notice the chevron-only Oval
    menu (and were surprised, once shown, that it
    contained little of relevance)

  • The hamburger menu prioritized parent organization
    content (unrelated to tasking) over venue information

 

​​​​​​​​What Participants Said:​

"These menus are tricky. I'm focusing on them because

that's where I'd normally go but they're confusing." 

 

The Impact: Users couldn't find basic program information,
leading to potential lost registrations and revenue. Staff
reported receiving calls about information that should be
easily findable online.

​

Finding 2: Missing Search Function Forced Manual Hunting

 

The Evidence:

  • All participants verbally requested a search function

  • 66.7% cited search as essential for task completion in post-test feedback

  • Users resorted to browser find (Ctrl+F) as a poor workaround for the lack of search

 

What Participants Said:​

"Search would be handy but not seeing a button where I'd think it would be. Guess I'll have to keep digging." 

​

The Impact: Without search, users had to manually navigate through poorly organized menus, significantly increasing time-on-task and levels of frustration.

​

Finding 3: Logo Behavior Broke the "Emergency Exit" Convention

 

The Evidence:

  • 100% of participants clicked the logo in the upper left of the screen, expecting to return to the Oval homepage

  • Logo instead redirected to parent organization (the Foundation) site

  • Users became disoriented and struggled to return to their starting point

 

What Participants Said:​

"Well, I clicked on the logo thinking it would take me back to the homepage but I'm apparently not there." 

​

Finding 4: Support Resources Failed When Users Needed Help Most

 

The Evidence:

  • FAQs page contained only 4 questions, mostly irrelevant to actual
    user questions and strangely minimal for a major Olympic venue

  • Contact information either led to the wrong support team or was missing entirely

  • No venue-specific phone number displayed on contact page

 

​​​​​​​​What Participants Said:​

"Wow—that's it? An Olympic facility with all this programming and only
four questions? I'd think people have way more questions than this."

 

The Impact: Users who encountered problems had no clear path to resolution, likely leading to abandoned tasks and lost business.​

​

Finding 5: Accessibility Issues Affected All Users

 

The Evidence:

  • Color contrast ratios appeared as low as 1.97:1 (WCAG requires 4.5:1 minimum)

  • White text on orange backgrounds caused readability issues

  • Even users without visual impairments struggled with effectively scanning certain screens (e.g., the track schedule)

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

 

 

 

 

 

What Participants Said:​

"Oh my—that's just an awful screen. So hard to read with those crazy colors."

​

The Impact: Poor contrast didn't just violate WCAG standards—it actively prevented users from reading critical information like schedules and pricing.

​

User Journey Map

After the usability testing, I created a user journey map to better visualize how users actually interacted with the site and to define key pain points.

​

4  |  My Recommendations: Designing for Both Olympians and Families

Immediate Fixes (Quick Wins!)

​

1. Add a search bar

  • Position prominently in header

  • Make persistent across all pages

  • Optimize for common queries from survey data

 

2. Fix the logo link

  • Redirect to Oval homepage, not Foundation homepage

  • Adhere to standard design conventions

  • Provide users with a reliable "emergency exit"

 

3. Expand FAQs

  • Track actual user questions through Oval frontline staff for 30 days

  • Build comprehensive FAQs based on real user/patron needs

  • Organize by user intent, not alphabetically

​

Strategic Improvements

 

1. Redesign Navigation Architecture

  • Prioritize Oval content in primary menu

  • Separate Foundation content into secondary navigation

  • Organize based on user mental models from testing

 

2. Create Dedicated Support System

  • Build venue-specific contact page

  • Add contextual help on program pages

  • Include question mark icons linking to support

 

3. Implement Appropriate Accessibility Standards

  • Update all color combinations to meet WCAG 2.1 guidelines

  • Underline links for non-color indicators (i.e., don't rely on color alone to indicate links and state changes)

  • Redesign complex schedules for better readability

 

Measuring Success

I proposed metrics aligned with both user needs and business goals:​

​

User Experience Metrics:

  • Task Completion Rate: Target 80%+ (baseline: <40%)

  • Navigation Ease: 4+ on 5-point scale (current: 2.0)

  • Overall Satisfaction: 4+ rating (current: 2.0)

 

Business Impact Metrics:

  • Reduced support calls for basic information

  • Increased online program registrations

  • Higher conversion rate for facility passes

 

Accessibility Compliance:

  • 100% WCAG 2.1 AA compliance

  • Reduced legal risk

  • Expanded user base inclusion

5  |  Reflection

The Unique Challenge
The Utah Olympic Oval serves dual identities — it's both an Olympic training facility preparing for 2034 and a community recreation center serving local families. The website needed to honor this Olympic legacy while being accessible enough for someone's grandmother to book an activity.

​

​What I Learned

  1. Context Matters in Testing: Conducting sessions at the actual venue helped participants connect emotionally with tasks and provide richer feedback

  2. Personas Ground Decisions: The three personas helped prioritize which navigation paths needed the most attention based on user frequency and importance

  3. Small Issues Compound: What seemed like minor heuristic violations (logo behavior, menu structure) created major task failures when combined

  4. Accessibility Benefits Everyone: Issues that violated WCAG standards also frustrated users without disabilities — good accessibility is good UX

 

Tools and Methods Used

  • Testing Environment: On-site at Utah Olympic Oval

  • Frameworks: Nielsen's 10 Heuristics, task-based usability testing per Steve Krug

  • Analysis Tools: Affinity mapping, persona development, task success metrics

  • Survey Platform: Google Forms for pre/post questionnaires

6 |  Had enough or are you thirsty for more?

Like what you see?

Let's chat.

© 2025 by Sean Hayden Anthony. Created with Wix.com

bottom of page